ERCOT Batch Zero Active · 7 Live ISO Feeds · Planning-Grade

Power is the
only constraint
that matters.

GridArche gives origination teams the grid intelligence to screen sites, model interconnection feasibility, and compress speed-to-power decisions — before committing capital.

2,600 GW National Queue
241 GW US DC Pipeline
4–10 yr IC Queue Wait
$1.4T US Utility Capex 2025–30
Trusted by teams originating across
ERCOT Markets
·
PJM Virginia Corridor
·
MISO Midwest
·
CAISO California
·
SPP Great Plains
·
AI Campus Development
·
Hyperscale Origination
The Constraint
"The bottleneck isn't land.
It isn't capital.
It isn't even permitting.
It's power delivery."

Grid interconnection queues now exceed 4–10 years in major US markets. The national backlog stands at 2,600 GW — five times the existing US generation fleet. Developers who evaluate sites the old way — land first, power second — are acquiring stranded assets.

84%
of DC decision-makers rank power availability as top-3 site criteria
$150M
spread in network upgrade cost estimates between best and worst case
18–24 mo
time-to-power premium — sites that hit this window command significant price premiums
The Platform

Every tool your origination team
needs. Nothing they don't.

Ten purpose-built capabilities — from site screening to IC brief export. No adapters. No workarounds.

01

Grid-Fit Scoring

Every candidate site scores 0–100 across seven calibrated dimensions — IC feasibility, queue timeline, upgrade cost, LMP stability, infrastructure, renewables mix, and regulatory exposure. Weights derived from LBNL and DOE research.

Timeline 28% Cost 22% Capacity 20% LMP 12% Infra 10% Renewables 8%
74Strong
52Viable
31Weak
02

HONEY Feasibility Engine

DC power flow on ISO network models. Hosting capacity P10/P50/P90. N‑1 contingency. Congestion exposure. <20ms per site. 6 study types.

P10
220 MW
P50
575 MW
P90
840 MW
03

Queue Intelligence

Live queue depth, cluster study timelines, and filing position dynamics across all 7 US ISO/RTOs. ERCOT Batch Zero, PJM CIFP, MISO SUGAR AI — all built in.

ERCOT78 GW · Batch Zero
PJM320 GW · VA Corridor
MISO270 GW · SUGAR AI
CAISO180 GW · Clean Grid
04

Site Intelligence Map

Geocoded portfolio on LMP zones, ISO boundaries, and queue congestion heat. Click any site for full Grid-Fit and HONEY summary. Export IC memos in one click.

ERCOT PJM MISO GF:74 GF:66
Unique to GridArche
05

Portfolio Load Modeler

The only platform that lets you model AI campus load profiles and run Onsite vs Grid scenario analysis directly against your existing project and site data — no re-entry. Select a project, pick a site, and the platform pre-populates target MW, ISO, and operational parameters automatically.

8760-hr load profile CSV export PUE benchmarks Workload mix sliders
SCENARIO COMPARISON Abilene West · 500 MW campus
✓ Best
Grid Only
Time to Power
28 mo
Annual Cost
$42M
Upfront Capex
$12M
Low Risk
Hybrid
Time to Power
20 mo
Annual Cost
$58M
Upfront Capex
$85M
Medium Risk
Full Onsite
Time to Power
14 mo
Annual Cost
$94M
Upfront Capex
$310M
Very High Risk
Onsite fuel types: Natural Gas Solar + BESS Nuclear SMR Diesel
Unique to GridArche
06

AI Grid Assistant

Context-aware AI advisor with full knowledge of your live portfolio, site data, and risk register. Ask about queue dynamics, SB6 requirements, PPA structuring, or ISO selection — and get an answer that knows your sites.

Which ISO for a 200MW campus in 18 months?
Based on your portfolio, ERCOT Batch Zero gives the shortest queue path at 24 mo. Consider SPP for sub-18 month if you can accept higher curtailment risk.
Biggest portfolio risks? SB6 requirements
07

Risk Register

Seven-dimension risk scoring with SLA-tracked mitigation cases, Kanban workflow, auto-triage by priority, and IC-ready PDF brief export. Live across all portfolio sites.

Interconnection
7/10
Congestion / Basis
3/10
Policy / Regulatory
5/10
08

Live Command Center

Real-time dashboard with live ERCOT grid data — current frequency, fuel mix, demand forecast, and live alarms. Auto-refresh. Demand pressure visualizer across all ISO regions.

59.98 Hz
ERCOT Frequency
71 GW
Current Load
43%
Wind Share
09

Power Strategy

Grid-only vs hybrid vs full onsite Gantt timelines. Break-even analysis. SB6 compliance logic for Texas. Compare gas, solar, BESS, nuclear SMR side-by-side.

10

Service Console

IC application ticket management with SLA tracking, status Kanban (Backlog → In Progress → Filed → Complete), priority scoring, and PDF export. Built for origination operations teams.

HONEY Engine

Planning-grade.
Not a black box.
Not a consultant.

HONEY — Hybrid Optimization Network for Energy Yield — runs simplified DC power flow on ISO-calibrated network models. Seven ISOs. Bus-level resolution in ERCOT and PJM. Results in milliseconds, calibrated against LBNL and EIA data.

±20–35% stated uncertainty band on all results
Calibrated against LBNL Queued Up 2024, EPA eGRID 2024
Supports screening only. Not a utility interconnection study.
6 study types · 8 risk dimensions · IC probability · PDF export
See a Live Study
Marginal · 52/100 Planning-grade
Abilene West — AEP 138kV
ERCOT · TX · 320MW available
52%
IC Probability
575
P50 MW
7yr
Expected COD
CAPACITY BANDS
P10
220 MW
P50
575 MW
P90
840 MW
RISK DIMENSIONS
Interconnection
7/10
Congestion / Basis
3/10
Policy / Regulatory
5/10
Carbon Alignment
4/10
Planning-grade ±20–35% · Not a utility study · LBNL + EPA eGRID
Workflow

Site list to investment brief.
Four steps.

01

Build site pipeline

Import or create candidate sites. Auto-fill populates ISO, energy baselines, LMP data. Assign to projects.

02

Run HONEY studies

One click runs all six study types per site. Hosting capacity, IC probability, congestion, flexibility, resilience. In seconds.

03

Compare and rank

Grid-Fit Leaderboard. Head-to-head table with winner detection. CO₂ intensity by ISO. Demand pressure forecast.

04

Export IC brief

One-click PDF. Grid-Fit score, capacity bands, risk dimensions, recommended action. Board and IC committee ready.

Solutions

Built for the teams making
power origination decisions.

Screen before you acquire.

Identify sites with realistic 18–24 month time-to-power paths before committing to land acquisition. Model interconnection timelines and upgrade cost ranges across ISO territories. Avoid stranded site positions.

  • Pre-acquisition grid screening across all 7 ISOs
  • Queue position and study timeline modeling
  • Upgrade cost banding (P10/P50/P90)
  • Power strategy comparison: grid vs hybrid vs onsite
18–24 mo
time-to-power window that commands a premium

Prioritize your pipeline at portfolio scale.

Evaluate and rank large-load portfolios across multiple ISOs simultaneously. Build Grid-Fit rankings for IC committee review. Track risk dimensions, SLA milestones, and mitigation cases across your entire origination pipeline.

  • Portfolio-level site ranking and filtering
  • IC committee briefing export (PDF)
  • Risk register with 7-dimension scoring
  • SLA-tracked mitigation case console
7
risk dimensions scored automatically from site data

Validate developer claims before deploying capital.

Stress-test site feasibility assumptions independently. Validate hosting capacity estimates and interconnection timeline claims with planning-grade modeling. Identify concentration risk in a portfolio of power origination positions.

  • Independent feasibility verification
  • Developer claim cross-check with HONEY
  • Portfolio concentration risk analysis
  • IC timeline credibility scoring
±20–35%
stated uncertainty bound on all HONEY outputs

Model large-load requests with grid context.

Evaluate large-load interconnection requests with planning-grade grid analysis. Assess substation headroom, network upgrade scope, and congestion exposure before filing. Support transmission planning with queue-aware scenario modeling.

  • Large-load interconnection pre-screening
  • Substation headroom and upgrade scope estimation
  • Queue-aware congestion analysis
  • Transmission planning scenario support
<20ms
per-site HONEY study solve time
FAQ

Questions from origination teams.

Talk to an expert →
How accurate is the HONEY feasibility engine?

HONEY returns planning-grade estimates with a stated ±20–35% uncertainty band — calibrated against LBNL "Queued Up" 2024 data and EPA eGRID. It is appropriate for site screening and portfolio prioritization. It does not replace a formal utility Facilities Study (PSS/E, PSCAD) required for an interconnection agreement.

What data does GridArche use?

Exclusively public, officially documented APIs: ERCOT Public API (Batch Zero, fuel mix, load forecast), CAISO OASIS (LMP, load forecast), EIA Open Data (grid operations, plant registry), LBNL Queued Up 2024 (queue statistics), EPA eGRID 2024 (CO₂ intensity by region). All data is treated as "as-is" with no warranty.

Does GridArche replace a utility interconnection study?

No. GridArche is a screening platform. It identifies which sites merit a formal application and which do not — before spending 12–24 months in a utility study queue. The formal study process (Feasibility, System Impact, Facilities Study) remains the authoritative source for actual interconnection requirements.

How is GridArche different from Enverus or other energy platforms?

Most energy data platforms serve oil and gas producers, traders, and investors — with broad datasets adapted for multiple use cases. GridArche is purpose-built for large-load origination: the Grid-Fit scoring engine, HONEY feasibility modeling, IC queue intelligence, and planning brief export are built specifically for this workflow, not adapted from a broader product.

What does "planning-grade" mean?

Outputs derived from public grid data, calibrated against industry research, with stated uncertainty bounds. Suitable for investment screening, IC committee review, and pre-application diligence. Not suitable for interconnection agreement filings, rate case proceedings, or regulatory submissions.

Request Access

The grid constraint is not
going away.
Start modeling it.

We'll walk through Grid-Fit scoring, HONEY feasibility results, and IC brief generation for sites you're actively evaluating.

No sales pressure. Technical questions welcome.